Journal of Modern Craft 3.3

Third issue of 2010

Articles

Editorial introduction: Tools of Trades by Jon Wood

Silence and Tools: (Non)verbalizing Sculptor’s Practice by Jyrki Siukonen

The Tortoise and the Hare: Extempore Performance and Sculptural Practice in Eighteenth-century France by Tomas Macsotay

Plastic Pleasures: Reconsidering the Practice of Modeling through Manuals of Sculpture Technique, c.1880-1933 by Ann Compton

Constantin Brancusi and the Image of Trade: Aspects of Trade in the Realm of Modern Fine Arts by Nina Gulicher

Statement of practice

Maxwell’s Silver Hammer by Edward Allington (PDF)

Soliz Clay, Tools and Tooling by Cecile Johnson

New Territories in the Round: Krysten Cunningham in Conversation with Jon Wood

Reviews

The View from Nowhere by Matthew C. Hunter

Evans Warren Seelig: Textile Per Se by Heidi Nasstrom

Making Time: Craft and the Slow Revolution by Martina Margetts

Vicki Halper and Diane Douglas (eds.) Choosing Craft: The Artist’s Viewpoint by Sandra Alfoldy

Elissa Auther  String, Felt, Thread: The Hierarchy of Art and Craft in American Art by Jenni Sorkin

5 thoughts on “Journal of Modern Craft 3.3

  1. Pingback: The Journal of Modern Craft | Blog | When sculptors craft

  2. Hi, Ezra Shales has asked me to review his exhibition, Raw Goods at Alfred University. I’m looking for the editorial specifics (length, style manual, etc.) and a temporary login if necessary.

    Thanks,
    Sarah

  3. Are you thinking of submitting this online or in the print edition? If online, then you need to join the Table (see fields on top right of screen). For print edition, then you need to contact the Exhibition Reviews Editor (see about link in the Info menu above).

  4. I found Edward Allington’s prolific descriptions of hammers eloquent and deeply informative. I was captivated by his analysis of how hammers harness physics at the intersection of the hands, the mind and materials. I used his statement, “Tools are a mediating mechanism between aim, both literally and conceptually, a material and an action” as systems thinking to make tools to cast large paper funnels. Combined with his reference to Richard Serras conceptual use of verbs as ‘tools’, my hands were set in motion.

    aim: big [graduate school] focus: [march 9th review]
    conceptual: [receive – nurture – process]
    material: abaca pulp
    action: support, filter, press, cast, suspend, circulate, release, light

    Although my mind did wander during the breadth and depth of descriptions, they sparked a brainstorm on an improvisational tool to felt wool. The aim is to compress and tangle the wool fibers into a dense matt. When done by hand, it takes hard labor to impose adequate compression and friction. As I day dream, I wonder if the principle seen in the dead blow hammer where a cylinder contains lead shot might deliver extra compression to the wool fibers? What if the “heavy blow” was delivered along the length of a fluted tube? The answer, after an initial prototype. most likely would be yet another prototype. Who knows if it would work?

    The series of questions in the first paragraph is where I lingered. “Do children or adults know or have an understanding of how things are made?” As well as the rebuke that children must “understand that the world we inhabit is a product of labor.” I ask, “What transpires when “labor” does not accumulate in things?” Today, America’s primary labor is consumption of services. As a population of consumers whose energy demand stresses the ecosystem, the refrigerator Allington references, is an outdated tool. If we aim to achieve a zero carbon footprint, do the children of today have the conceptual tools to redesign a cooling device that reduces reliance on an inefficient electrical grid? Shall we work to prompt creative education and hope the next generation of children is as passionate as Edward Allington?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *