You are browsing the archive for USA.

Snow Furniture by Ethan W. Lasser

May 2, 2010 in Articles

image

image

Spring has finally come to the upper Midwest, and with its arrival Hongtao Zhou’s installation Snow Furniture is an increasingly distant memory (fig. 1). Over three intensive days in late January, Zhou, a woodworker and sculptor based in Madison, Wisconsin, used snow, ice and sticks to create a set of chairs outside the East Galleria of the Milwaukee Art Museum. Part performance piece and part political statement, the installation was one of the more unusual and provocative works in an exhibition of “green furniture” Zhou and I curated at the MAM.

image

image

image

image

As performance piece, Snow Furniture featured Zhou and a team of local school children (fig. 2). Bundled in down parkas to withstand twenty-degree temperature, these energetic assistants helped create the slushy material used to build the chairs. Zhou equipped them with an aluminium bucket, and sent them to fetch water from the shore of Lake Michigan, a few steps away from the museum. Snow was mixed in with this water, and then applied to an armature of sticks (fig 3). Within minutes, this mixture froze and the chairs took shape to the delight of the children and the audience of adults watching from inside the museum.

image

image

This might seem like an innocuous playground exercise or a variation on a snow sculpture competition, but the political stakes of the installation became evident a few days later, after an unusual early-February thaw. As temperatures rocketed into the high-40s, the chairs started to melt, morph and lose their rigidity (fig 4). They took on a biomorphic, surrealist air. “Dancing furniture” is the way Zhou described the installation when he returned to Milwaukee to enjoy the warmer air. He argued that the change in the shape of chairs called attention to the entropic effects of global warming. For Zhou, the work specifically indexed one of they key manifestations of climate change: increased temperature variation and the shift from steady seasonal patterns to rapid freezes and thaws.

As the winter went on and temperatures continued to vary, the chairs continued to dance. To return to the installation each morning was to see a fresh and reinvented work. One morning in late-February after a snowfall, the chairs looked like fluffy, upholstered divans. After a cold snap in March, they were icy and skeletal (fig 5). These variations tracked something more than the effects of climate change. The constant evolution of Snow Furniture showcased the artistry and animism of nature, the obsessive inventiveness of her masterful hand. Like the artist David Nash, who builds wooden sculptures out of unseasoned wood that changes shape as the material dries and shrinks, the aesthetic power of Snow Furniture hinged on nature’s power and unpredictability, on changing temperatures, wind speeds, and uncertain patterns of rain and snow. What was truly green about the installation was the way it called attention to this power—to nature as agent and artist.

image

image

Snow Furniture might seem like a good project for the Artic or some desolate tundra, rather than a factory town like Milwaukee. But the installation was closely connected to its site. Standing in front of the dancing chairs and looking south, one could see the crisp white atrium of the Milwaukee Art Museum, designed by Santiago Calatrava, and beyond it, the Milwaukee skyline (fig 6). A pair of belching smokestacks, vestiges of a once thriving industrial economy were particularly prominent. It was hard not to read the installation against these towers, and to juxtapose the pure, productive power of nature with the impure, productive power of the machine. “Nature,” Zhou explained, “was the perfect, carbon-neutral artist.”

Zhou, who is fond of such sagely pronouncements, is a fascinating character with an unusual background for an artist. Born in China, he came to the US in his mid-twenties to do a PhD in furniture engineering at Purdue. In his coursework and dissertation, he focused on the “lifecycle” of furniture. His challenge was to design a chair that would last for a definitive period. The goal was five years. Zhou mastered this challenge but wasn’t fulfilled by it. After he finished his degree, he moved from the factory to the studio to take up an MFA in woodworking under Tom Loeser at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. His focus has been on sustainability and environmentally-friendly furniture.

Snow Furniture reflects Zhou’s unusual training. Like any good engineer, he harnessed a force larger than himself to craft the chairs. And like his work at Purdue, he created a set of chairs that only existed for a fixed amount of time.

But while Zhou’s earlier designs failed and then endured as a series of parts, the dancing chairs evaporated into thin air, leaving no residue.

Gone without a trace and largely crafted by the power of nature, Snow Furniture invites us to reflect on the way we value art, and the premium we place on durability, artisanal skill, and the marks of the artist’s hand. Though his installation no longer presides in front of the museum, Zhou’s other-directed, ephemeral aesthetic raises questions for every artist to think through.

Ethan W. Lasser is curator of the Chipstone Foundation

See also the website for Hong Tao.

Journal of Modern Craft 2.3

December 6, 2009 in Notices, Table of Contents

Journal of Modern Craft 2-3

Journal of Modern Craft 2-3

Third issue of 2009

Editorial Introduction

Articles

A Ghost in the Machine Age: The Westerwald Stoneware Industry and German Design Reform, 1900–1914 by Freyja Hartzell

A Catalan Werkstätte? Arts and Crafts Schools between Modernisme and Noucentisme by Jordi Falgàs

Early Expressions of Anthroposophical Design in America: The Infuence of Rudolf Steiner and Fritz Westhoff on Wharton Esherick by Roberta A. Mayer and Mark Sfrri

Primary Text Commentary

Design in Ireland: Report of the Scandinavian Design Group in Ireland, April 1861, by Paul Caffrey

Statement of Practice

Handspring Puppet Company by Adrian Kohler, Basil Jones and Tommy Luther (pdf)

Exhibition Reviews

Craft in its Gaseous State: Wouldn’t It Be Nice … Wishful Thinking in Art and Design by Mònica Gaspar

Quiet Persuasion: Political Craft by Geraldine Craig

Book Reviews

A Theory of Craft: Function and Aesthetic Expression reviewed by Sandra Alfoldy

Designing Modern Britain reviewed by Peter Hughes

Studio craft should learn from the DIY movement

November 10, 2009 in Responses

image

image

emiko oye is another blogger who has been deeply engaged with the conversations that emerged at the American Craft conference. Here she provides JMC readers with her thoughts about the relation between DIY and studio craft:

 

While the New Wave DIY/Alt Craft scene (as brought to light by Faythe Levine’s Handmade Nation movie) has been going strong the last 5 or 6 years, it has just recently in the last couple of years started to turn the head of the studio craft world, and as witnessed at the recent ACC conference in Minneapolis, really spun some heads Exorcist style. Myself being active in both camps, especially living in the Bay Area where Alt Craft is really prominent (and inclusivity is more the norm), was somewhat unaware of the tensions forming between. But seeing it from a different angle, especially as studio crafters are struggling to make it in this economic climate, makes me realize how all the more important it is to bring these two craft worlds together, break down the stereotypes, misconceptions, and naïveté. Help each other to progress in order to move craft forward in the 21st century.

What DIY has going for it that studio craft desperately needs is infectious enthusiasm for making, that everyone can access their inner crafter and put it out there into the world without judgement from others. The scenario of “you too can make a …”–granted not everyone will be good at it, but the fact that the average consumer is being engaged in craft and realizing that handmade has more personal value than goods Made in China. People begin to understand why handmade items are priced higher than WalMart, appreciate the skill it takes to make something special, and in turn be happy to open their wallets to purchase craft goods. As Rob Walker so succinctly stated during his marketplace presentation, “The mistake people (i.e. crafters) make is in thinking that the most important story is their story, but it isn’t…best when your story is relevant to other’s (i.e. consumer’s) lives.” Today’s consumer is more conscious of where products are made and if they are environmentally and socially responsible. This is where makers and buyers share some similar lifestyle values.

Other reasons for the success of DIY is that they align themselves with various areas of Design and fully embrace new technology. Graphic designers play a big role in marketing and promoting the fairs and events as well as selling their 2D artwork at the fairs. Fashion designers too are included in this mix, often times showcasing many designers work in onsite fashion shows. Craft shows with an entertainment aspect—music, food, and performances. And most importantly, DIY utilizes the web to its full potential, spreading buzz through social networking, blogs, websites, tweets, etc. This is where studio craft needs to catch up fast and get on the 2.0 train or be left out in the cold.

If studio craft can pick up and run with these points that make DIY successful, and in the meantime offer wisdom to DIY on how to be professional artists in the business world, we’d help elevate each other and craft to new heights. This realization has inspired me to attempt to bridge the gap in a symposium that I am organizing for the Metal Arts Guild in 2011 since the West Coast has such a rich history and larger population of both studio craft and DIY.

Websites:

Bad Behavior has blocked 1134 access attempts in the last 7 days.